« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Car vs Property  (Read 8651 times)

misterteddy

  • Guest
Car vs Property
« on: October 27, 2011, 10:56:29 AM »
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/car-runs-through-three-fences-and-crashes-into-prospect-house-ending-up-in-front-room/story-e6frea83-1226177934815

interesting arrangement of shoring left in situ...

What was the rated strength of that single (not quite vertical) piece of wood again?
Logged

Offline crossy

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 86
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Car vs Property
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2011, 11:22:18 AM »
Looking at the ceiling line I'm guessing there's only 2 or so rows left? Probably holding very little weight....
Logged
cant prove it?? then i didnt do it......

Offline FlameTrees

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Car vs Property
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2011, 01:55:52 PM »
Looks like some acrow props in there too.

(Edited after looked at photo again and realising my first reply was full of filtered)
Logged
"is that negative as in yes, or negative as in no" - actual radio transmission from the field.......

Offline bajdas

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,745
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Car vs Property
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2011, 05:05:24 PM »
This gives a photograph from a different viewpoint.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-10-27/car-house-fences-churchill-road/3602880

I assume the acro-prop in the front is holding majority of the weight.
Logged
Andrew Macmichael
lives at Pt Noarlunga South.

My personal opinion only.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

anything