Author Topic: Open letter to the SES  (Read 23732 times)

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Open letter to the SES
« on: July 31, 2010, 08:50:54 PM »
Dear SES,

If a job is important enough for you to travel to it with your visible and audible warning devices operating, why are is the local Fire Station deemed unworthy of being responded? Are you THAT jealous of the Fire Station being able to turn out and get to a job in under an hour? Scared of the local fire trucks finishing the job before you arrive? Why so cagey?

Love,

The Fire Brigade.
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

Offline Alex

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 675
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2010, 09:30:29 PM »
What job are ya whinging about this time mate? Doesnt look to me as though this has occured at all during this event?

Offline Alex

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 675
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2010, 09:38:13 PM »
Looks like your wishes have been answered anwyay mate.

*CFSRES INC104 31/07/10 21:06,RESPOND Flooding/Salvage,20-20B NORTH RAILWAY TCE,NAIRNE MAP 161 M 9 TG128,RESPOND TO ASSIST SES URGENT ASSITANCE R,EQUIRE
D.,NAIR00 LTHT00

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2010, 09:52:19 PM »
What job are ya whinging about this time mate? Doesnt look to me as though this has occured at all during this event?

Can I draw your attention to a handful of jobs that have been turned out as P1 (not bothering with P2, as that covers near 99% of the others)without a Fire Appliance attending:

31-07-10 21:01:13 SCC: *CFSRES: TASK NO 12, RESPOND TREE DOWN, MOONEE HILLS ROAD BETWEEN HERMANS GATEWAY AND WATSONS GATEWAY MILL PARK, TREE ON MAIN ROAD, VICKY, P1, MEN

31-07-10 20:57:52 SCC: *CFSRES: TASK NO 14, RESPOND TREE DOWN, LOT 3 VIRGO RD MURRAY BRIDGE, ON ROAD WITH POWER LINES ETSA CONTACTED, TIFFANY, P1, MRB

31-07-10 20:46:11 SCC: *CFSRES: TASK NO 9, RESPOND FLOOD THREAT, 69 MAIN STR GERMAN ARMS HOTEL HAHNDORF, NEED SANBAGGING, JOSH, P1, MTB

Et cetera, et cetera...

It's not hard Gentlemen! (See! You even got it right ONCE! with DIN 99 / Task 7)

Head (out of) Arse.
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

Offline Alex

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 675
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2010, 09:58:48 PM »
MMM bit strange mate, but same old.

I guess we can always take a good hard look at ourselves though and the way we turn ourselves out. Most of the CFS brigades out there managing there own responses via ALERTS are sending the wrong trucks to locations and insufficient resources.

CFS as a service cant exactly throw stones.

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #5 on: July 31, 2010, 10:01:46 PM »
CFS as a service cant exactly throw stones.

As a service? God no. But then again, I'll happily throw stones at the SACFS and anyone else deserving them.  :wink:
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

Offline Andrew K

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 70
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #6 on: July 31, 2010, 10:07:40 PM »
numbers maybe you might want to rememeber

John 8:7 "let he who is without sin, cast the first stone""

if you don't like how SCC do it i'm sure they would love your help.

also does a tree on power lines really need a fire truck?, you can't touch it any more than we can. if its blocking a road get sapol to babysit until etsa deal with it


« Last Edit: July 31, 2010, 10:09:39 PM by Andrew K »

Offline Bagyassfirey

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 891
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #7 on: July 31, 2010, 10:20:20 PM »
HAHAHAHA GROW UP !!

Offline Andrew K

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 70
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #8 on: July 31, 2010, 10:44:54 PM »
have to agree to that,

on another question can scc actaully drop pages for cfs and mfs, just watching the pager site, the last few tree jobs to cfs units have come from mfs while scc is still open

Offline Zippy

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,540
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #9 on: August 01, 2010, 12:36:17 AM »
depends which number the person calls, and how generous the fire comcen operator is i bet ;)

Ive seen some people get hung up on during a event like this for calling 000..

Offline Alex

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 675
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #10 on: August 01, 2010, 12:41:15 AM »
Andrew - SES SCC can only page/respond SES resources.

Offline fly

  • Forum Recruit
  • *
  • Posts: 17
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #11 on: August 01, 2010, 01:12:51 AM »
"31-07-10 20:57:52 SCC: *CFSRES: TASK NO 14, RESPOND TREE DOWN, LOT 3 VIRGO RD MURRAY BRIDGE, ON ROAD WITH POWER LINES ETSA CONTACTED, TIFFANY, P1, MRB"

local knowledge goes a long way.... like its a back street.... dirt road.... edge of town... NO HUGE life threat....

obviousally use ur noggin...
people have brains for a reason.

Not bagging SES nor sticking up for just think that common sense goes a long way.

BTW this job was NOT treated as a P1 by the MRB guys they drove under normal aussie road rules......

 :-)
"lets not meet by accident"

Offline boredmatrix

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 644
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #12 on: August 01, 2010, 04:44:28 PM »
Dear SES,

If a job is important enough for you to travel to it with your visible and audible warning devices operating, why are is the local Fire Station deemed unworthy of being responded? Are you THAT jealous of the Fire Station being able to turn out and get to a job in under an hour? Scared of the local fire trucks finishing the job before you arrive? Why so cagey?

Love,

The Fire Brigade.

.....or perhaps the remote possibility of a structure somewhere catching fire while you water-fairies are out doing the SES's jobs....

how many extenguishers do SES trucks carry?

Offline Andrew K

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 70
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #13 on: August 01, 2010, 06:12:19 PM »
ours has 3 so we can deal with most small things that power liens down might cause

Offline boredmatrix

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 644
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #14 on: August 01, 2010, 11:55:11 PM »
ours has 3 so we can deal with most small things that power liens down might cause

think you might have missed the point.

3 extinguishers for a going house fire?

   :? :?        I think not.....

if the appliances are out doing tree down jobs - who deals with the going structure fire...or the "benign" FIP that ends up being a real one!?

and lets do have some smarts about it - if we start thinking that we can amalgamate the two services - then where is the fat in the system?!

I'm sure at Penola this week pretty much EVERYTHING from both services would have been put to use - yet the rest of the year the GO's and the SES unit managers were sitting there looking at the gear in their respective stations thinking "why do we need this much stuff between two services?  What a waste of money...." 

that's why it's called "surge capacity" - the Tornado doesn't hit just one property every two hours so you can deal with it before moving onto the next one.....




Offline Zippy

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,540
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #15 on: August 02, 2010, 02:48:19 AM »
ive just had a quick look over the Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission report summary.  I spotted a good paragraph about Surge Capacity, and the way it did manage to work well somewhat that day.  I support Boredmatrix's words re that. It is a easy thought to overlook.

You only need to look at the nations USAR surge capacity and think...probably not enough still?  Particularly SA's USAR capability.

Offline Andrew K

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 70
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #16 on: August 02, 2010, 07:23:31 AM »
not really, the main thing a fire truck provides is fire cover (a still 180 doesn't cut if for a good portion of the trees we see), which may be an issue for downed power lines sparking etc creating small fires / smoldering embers, 99% of you don't need a fire truck to put out

why send a truck to a job when all they can do is sit for etsa and wait same as we can may as well use sapol and then call it in once the lines are cleared.

Offline chook

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,191
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #17 on: August 03, 2010, 07:58:46 PM »
I guess Andrew & everyone else, what Numbers is saying is going "full noise" to a job when as you said yourself - it will be hurry up & wait is stupid!
Sapol (or in fact a fire appliance - if it was closer) could warn of the hazard until a trained & properly equipped team arrives on scene(which ever service).
The real problem is that P1 is overused.
And I have real issues with people who's only qualification is a drivers licence, driving a medium to heavy vehicle P1 to any job (doesn't matter which service) - until drivers are properly qualified to to do this task then no one should be driving P1 especially in metro/built up areas.
We have a real simple system Respond (full noise, life property threat & a gold licence) & Proceed (normal response - for every other task & for those without a gold licence regardless of the task). Having completed the "respond" (Drive vehicles under operational conditions - not the 4x4 )course  which includes video of NSWFB & Ambulance service driving Respond in Sydney & completing a very tough assessment with a Fed cop I have realised just how much of a risk I was taking driving trucks at P1 in SA (even though I have had years of experience driving heavy vehicles including defence advanced driving -just my thoughts cheers 
Ken
just another retard!

Offline jaff

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 848
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #18 on: August 05, 2010, 12:03:18 AM »
Chook.......what the hell has got into you, that post was half sensible!....have you been training secrectly with a fire service?
Just Another Filtered Fireman

Offline chook

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,191
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #19 on: August 05, 2010, 07:12:27 AM »
No not at all - just seeing things from a different point of view :wink:
Ken
just another retard!

Offline straps

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 146
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #20 on: August 08, 2010, 06:28:27 PM »
Quote
1908032 17:32:27 08-08-10 MFS: *CFSRES INC040 08/08/10 17:30,RESPOND Tree Down,7 ROCHESTER AV,COLONEL LIGHT GARDENS MAP 142 D 4,ASSIST ETSA, LARGE TREE DOWN ON POWER LI,NES, PWR IS OFF CALL DAVE ON 0403582153,P1,MIT020
SES Metro South Info

Forgive me for asking but why P1 for this job...??? (I do appreciate that a pager message is only providing limited info, and there might be additional intel to suggest a need for a P1 response)..???

Cheers
Shane

Offline boredmatrix

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 644
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #21 on: August 09, 2010, 12:38:07 AM »
the same could be asked as to why SAAS sends crews Cat B to medical alarms with no voice contact- the large majority being activation errors. 

When SPRINT cars are being used properly they sometimes get tasked solo to these jobs with good effect- but they are still responded full noise.

The fact remains that everyone is so worried about being taken to task by the coroner (or in this state- the media...usually the Advertiser or channel 7) for the 'what if' scenario- that they routinely put staff at risk because of it!  Sure- SAAS staff spend the better part of a week doing a driver training program......not sure what SES or fireys get....but is this an appropriate measured risk?

Not the way i've seen SES blokes driving it's not......

Offline SA Firey

  • Forum Group Officer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,967
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #22 on: August 09, 2010, 10:09:49 AM »
It all comes down to Risk=Response, and the driver is the one who will get the please explain from the coroner, not the OIC.

Everyone regardless of who they are must "drive with due care" and every service has had its fair share of siren jockeys over the years SAAS included...(SPRINT CAR airbourne over median strips comes to mind) :evil:   
Images are copyright

Offline bajdas

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,745
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #23 on: August 09, 2010, 12:01:07 PM »
Quote
1908032 17:32:27 08-08-10 MFS: *CFSRES INC040 08/08/10 17:30,RESPOND Tree Down,7 ROCHESTER AV,COLONEL LIGHT GARDENS MAP 142 D 4,ASSIST ETSA, LARGE TREE DOWN ON POWER LI,NES, PWR IS OFF CALL DAVE ON 0403582153,P1,MIT020
SES Metro South Info

Forgive me for asking but why P1 for this job...??? (I do appreciate that a pager message is only providing limited info, and there might be additional intel to suggest a need for a P1 response)..???

Cheers
Shane

I think the risk is electrical from the street powerlines, to the public, if the line snaps. Standard computer setting even though ETSA are there.

Most Duty Officers of Units will get more information from the caller as volunteers respond (the reason for caller telephone numbers on the pager).

The actual response driving decision is made by the driver / OIC with the updated sitrep. In this case that sitrep includes ETSA is on site.

Not everyone responds how the computer paging system suggests.
Andrew Macmichael
lives at Pt Noarlunga South.

My personal opinion only.

Offline disOrderly

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 198
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Open letter to the SES
« Reply #24 on: September 21, 2010, 03:56:22 AM »
Forgive me if I am wrong, but isn't the theory of lights and sirens to signal other drivers to move out the way and to allow emergency vehicles right of passage through intersections etc and not to drive fast. In the above scenario, could the crew still stick to the speed limit and use lights and sirens to clear traffic? I have seen SAAS do this many times, for example it's late night and there are few cars on the road, so they might do just above the speed limit with just the lights on and use the siren through intersections.
Check out the Australian Healthcare Forums: http://aushealth.forumup.com.au/

 

anything