Well, we currently have only one fire service, so perhaps it would be better to see working groups within that framework work with the mindset of "Urban Fulltime, Urban Volunteer, Fulltime Rural, Volunteer Rural". As it stands within the CFS, it stinks. The best 'Urban' truck we can make is a spec from another State, not bothering with the "Rescue" variants of the truck - the CFS and the rural boys that sit on the Appliance committees need to have their heads read.
Honestly, I would love to know where these responses came from and what they mean by "overly "urban" centric". What? They carry CABA? and a ceiling hook? and 'pumpers' have no crew deck?! Because thats about the only vaguely urban thing around these days. 34P's wouldn't know what 'a lot of hose' or Urban stowage looked like. The same can essentially be said about Pumpers.
How complicated are things really? Pumps can be intimidating, but they are are simple. The equipment? Apart from RCR and some Hazmat stuff its all very basic... Were the volunteers that did the survey smoking?
WE can't have 3 fire brigades as the urban CFS bit would be so small they would get completely neglected.
Look at SAMFS. They are one of the smallest paid services in the country, but they have great gear, great trucks and are pushing the envelope in places. They can afford to do this when they are only fitting out 16 station. If the 'Urban CFS' only has a handful of stations it may make it easier to move forward. Designing a truck for ONLY 10 brigades that has a short list of specific uses is far easier than developing a truck for the entire state with 1000's of uses.
where did URBAN CFS come from?
If it's that urban - why haven't MFS taken it over?
oh wait....free labour..that would be why....
I'd say 'Urban CFS' comes around when a Brigade is turning out to more 'Urban' incidents than 'Rural'.
And yeah, its free labour. Do you really think the state could afford a paid station in every location that warrants it?