Author Topic: Interesting Fire and Emergency Related Paging (Read 4727715 times)

Robert-Robert34 · « **Reply #2200 on:** December 31, 2009, 06:38:47 PM »

Good to see Monash brigade blowing the cobwebs out of their station siren cause theres alot more bigger fires to come

Pipster · « **Reply #2201 on:** December 31, 2009, 07:42:39 PM »

Don't jinx them Robert!!!

calspec · « **Reply #2202 on:** January 02, 2010, 11:46:13 AM »

25:21 02-01-10 CFS: *CFSRES BOMBER 580/582 & FIREBIRD 504 RESPOND GRASSFIRE NAIRNE 172 DEGREES 7 KMS FROM WAB PIR 878042 > 2/01/2010 12:23:00 PM CFS/NRG Leigh Creek Response

550kms

Surely we had an observation chopper stationed closer than Leigh Creek?

Pipster · « **Reply #2203 on:** January 02, 2010, 03:22:01 PM »

Looks like the NRG guys, for some reason, are on the paging list to recieve the dispatch messages for the Bombers...like many other Groupies & Captains around the place....

The Bombers were at WAB - Woodside Airbase, so not far away......

Pip

Robert-Robert34 · « **Reply #2204 on:** January 03, 2010, 12:03:15 PM »

1909319 12:38:44 03-01-10 MFS: *CFSRES INC034 03/01/10 12:37,RESPOND Marine Vessel,ROBE ,ROBE MAP 0 0 0 TG229,BOAT FIRE. 2KM OFF SHORE WEST OF THE OBE,LISK. APPROX 1.5KM W OF ROBE. R.V. POINT, ROBE BOAT RAMP FOR AMBOS & SAPOL.,ROBE19 MIL029 CFS Robe Group Officers Response

Hmmm interesting situation but one problem the robe brigade dont have a response boat

bajdas · « **Reply #2205 on:** January 03, 2010, 12:18:35 PM »

Quote from: Robert-Robert34 on January 03, 2010, 12:03:15 PM

1909319 12:38:44 03-01-10 MFS: *CFSRES INC034 03/01/10 12:37,RESPOND Marine Vessel,ROBE ,ROBE MAP 0 0 0 TG229,BOAT FIRE. 2KM OFF SHORE WEST OF THE OBE,LISK. APPROX 1.5KM W OF ROBE. R.V. POINT, ROBE BOAT RAMP FOR AMBOS & SAPOL.,ROBE19 MIL029 CFS Robe Group Officers Response

Hmmm interesting situation but one problem the robe brigade dont have a response boat

But Kingston SE SES do which Millicent SES would know.

12:47:24 03-01-10 MFS: FROM ROBE CFS, STOP MESSAGE FOR INCIDENT 34 - BOAT FIRE. THANKYOU. CFS Robe Response

I would assume Robe CFS were able to find out the local extra information you cannot place on a page.

Robert-Robert34 · « **Reply #2206 on:** January 03, 2010, 01:06:55 PM »

That would explain this message

1909323 12:40:18 03-01-10 MFS: CONTACT DETAILS FOR REPORTING PERSON IS - PETER DOUGLAS, **** *** ***. HE IS IN A ANOTHER BOAT ASISSTING VESSEL. CFS Robe Response

Darius · « **Reply #2207 on:** January 04, 2010, 08:23:12 AM »

Quote from: Pipster on January 02, 2010, 03:22:01 PM

Looks like the NRG guys, for some reason, are on the paging list to recieve the dispatch messages for the Bombers...like many other Groupies & Captains around the place....

not just that, the NRG guys also get SIG INC pages too (not all the time but often). It was advised to HQ this was occuring a long time ago but nothing has been done about it, I guess if the NRG guys aren't complaining who cares.

Alex · « **Reply #2208 on:** January 04, 2010, 07:32:57 PM »

Quote from: Darius on January 04, 2010, 08:23:12 AM

Quote from: Pipster on January 02, 2010, 03:22:01 PM
Looks like the NRG guys, for some reason, are on the paging list to recieve the dispatch messages for the Bombers...like many other Groupies & Captains around the place....

not just that, the NRG guys also get SIG INC pages too (not all the time but often). It was advised to HQ this was occuring a long time ago but nothing has been done about it, I guess if the NRG guys aren't complaining who cares.

Or perhaps there just meant to get it to keep them updated.

Robert-Robert34 · « **Reply #2209 on:** January 04, 2010, 08:06:50 PM »

The NRG guys hardly get any fire calls at all so this is a way to keep them informed of whats happening on the outside world

Zippy · « **Reply #2210 on:** January 04, 2010, 10:30:12 PM »

Leigh Creek is rather isolated, i guess if anyone of us were there, we'd love to recieve random pager messages!

Darren · « **Reply #2211 on:** January 04, 2010, 10:51:27 PM »

Or possibly its an old address that is used for something else now?

Alan (Big Al) · « **Reply #2212 on:** January 05, 2010, 01:44:12 PM »

1908904 15:07:33 05-01-10 MFS: *CFSRES INC043 05/01/10 15:07,RESPOND GRASS FIRE,WELLINGTON RD,WISTOW MAP 000 0 0 TG128,HIGHLAND VALLEY NEAR ARCHER HILL,LTHT42 LTHT00 NAIR00

After listnening to an absolute scheiße storm over the radio between the IC and a lt from an appliance regarding closest appropriate resources not being responded, is it appropriate to to do this or is it better logging your grievances after the incident.

6739264 · « **Reply #2213 on:** January 05, 2010, 02:33:37 PM »

And the subsequent manual turnout...

15:04:01 05-01-10 STBN: *CFSRES: RESPOND STRATHALBYN STATION MANUAL TURNOUT 05-01-10 15:03

That was quite a nice little conversation on the radio. Frankly,the Woodchester Lt. should probably shut up and log his grievances later.

Mike · « **Reply #2214 on:** January 05, 2010, 03:32:30 PM »

And the subsequent:

1909035 15:13:14 05-01-10 STBN: STOP CALL RECEIVED 05-01-10 15:12 CFS Strathalbyn Response

Not having heard it, I could understand something being said. Sounds like things mave have gone a little to far?? Certainly should be followed up after the incident in any case.
Why was the manual turnout message generated though? Even if it was just to get crew to the station, its boarderline to self responding...

DaveP · « **Reply #2215 on:** January 05, 2010, 03:33:54 PM »

I did not hear the conversation but in a hypothetical situation that ends in the coroners court , if the question is asked of an individual - "Did you believe that there were closer, more appropriate units available?" and the answer is given - "yes" the subsequent question would surely be " What did you do to improve the situation?" . What would the coroner consider the best answer - " I decided to shut up and log my grievance later" or "I made sure the Incident controller was aware of the options I knew about" ?

jason · « **Reply #2216 on:** January 05, 2010, 04:03:49 PM »

Quote from: Alan (Big Al) on January 05, 2010, 01:44:12 PM

1908904 15:07:33 05-01-10 MFS: *CFSRES INC043 05/01/10 15:07,RESPOND GRASS FIRE,WELLINGTON RD,WISTOW MAP 000 0 0 TG128,HIGHLAND VALLEY NEAR ARCHER HILL,LTHT42 LTHT00 NAIR00

After listnening to an absolute filtered storm over the radio between the IC and a lt from an appliance regarding closest appropriate resources not being responded, is it appropriate to to do this or is it better logging your grievances after the incident.

Google Maps - Wellington Road / Bunnetts Road

Nairne..14.6km

Littlehampton... 12km

Strathalbyn.... 15km

Darren · « **Reply #2217 on:** January 05, 2010, 05:10:24 PM »

Yeah last time I checked its not that far from littlehampton to wistow, same with Nairne, around the back way they are fairly quick. After that response no further resources were needed.

Yeah, that Lt from Woodchester sure did his block, but I am sure the IC has his reasons for following response plans........

6739264 · « **Reply #2218 on:** January 05, 2010, 05:48:06 PM »

Quote from: DaveP on January 05, 2010, 03:33:54 PM

I did not hear the conversation but in a hypothetical situation that ends in the coroners court , if the question is asked of an individual - "Did you believe that there were closer, more appropriate units available?" and the answer is given - "yes" the subsequent question would surely be " What did you do to improve the situation?" . What would the coroner consider the best answer - " I decided to shut up and log my grievance later" or "I made sure the Incident controller was aware of the options I knew about" ?

As you said you didn't hear the conversation, but:

There is a LARGE difference between making your concerns known to the IC, and blowing up on the radio and pretty much demanding that your group be responded. Then having Strath manual turnout.

Especially when fact happens to prove that you are wrong in your assumptions of who is closer...

Alan (Big Al) · « **Reply #2219 on:** January 05, 2010, 08:18:21 PM »

1909195 21:32:18 05-01-10 GOOD EVENING. FYI SALISBURY 34P WILL NOW BE THE PRIMARY URBAN/RESCUE RESPONSE APPLIANCE. SALISBURY 24P WILL BE BACK UP AND RURAL RESPONSE. THANK YOU TO THOSE WHO ASSISTED TONIGHT. ANY QUERIES PLEASE CONTACT CAPTAIN.

1909190 21:36:16 05-01-10 MFS: *CFSRES INC064 05/01/10 21:35,RESPOND SCHOOL FIRE,KENSINGTON WAY,BURTON MAP 60 C 12 TG102,MULTIPLE CALLS,SLSB19 SAL321 SAL329
CFS Salisbury response

Good timing to christen the truck

SA Firey · « **Reply #2220 on:** January 05, 2010, 09:03:22 PM »

Quote from: Alan (Big Al) on January 05, 2010, 08:18:21 PM

1909195 21:32:18 05-01-10 GOOD EVENING. FYI SALISBURY 34P WILL NOW BE THE PRIMARY URBAN/RESCUE RESPONSE APPLIANCE. SALISBURY 24P WILL BE BACK UP AND RURAL RESPONSE. THANK YOU TO THOSE WHO ASSISTED TONIGHT. ANY QUERIES PLEASE CONTACT CAPTAIN.

1909190 21:36:16 05-01-10 MFS: *CFSRES INC064 05/01/10 21:35,RESPOND SCHOOL FIRE,KENSINGTON WAY,BURTON MAP 60 C 12 TG102,MULTIPLE CALLS,SLSB19 SAL321 SAL329
CFS Salisbury response

Good timing to christen the truck

They were out the door with both appliances straight away too, sounding like the BA crews are hard at work on the scanner

Hazmat206 · « **Reply #2221 on:** January 05, 2010, 10:29:46 PM »

1908958 16:25:56 05-01-10 Special meeting tomorrow night with McLaren Vale regarding Seaford MFS, so please make an effort to attend. Be at stn 19.30hrs. CAPT. CFS Aldinga Info

Bagyassfirey · « **Reply #2222 on:** January 07, 2010, 01:34:35 PM »

LOFT GOs: Small fire at coro, bombers stop called. GCO Dave 7/1/2010 14:8:48 CFS Lofty Group Officers Info

LOFT MGT: Grassfire hillside rd springfield, 441 on scene, Sturt group and bombers mobile. Tg146. GCO Dave 7/1/2010 14:38:35 CFS Lofty Group Management

LOFT MGT: springfield Grassfire only small, stop given. GCO Dave 7/1/2010 14:38:35 7/1/2010 14:43:24 CFS Lofty Group Management

LOFT MGT: FYI grassfire Pine Ave Hahndorf, approx 50x20m from bomber, at rear of soccer oval south of freeway. TG128. GCO Dave 7/1/2010 14:56:18 CFS Lofty Group Management

Loads of time on his hands...not a bad idea tho.

Darren · « **Reply #2223 on:** January 07, 2010, 02:04:52 PM »

15:00:48 07-01-10 LOFT: Bridgewater respond grassfire Pine Ave Hahndorf, TG128 *CFSRES 7/1/2010 15:0:38

Also doing his own responding to ......

Hazmat206 · « **Reply #2224 on:** January 07, 2010, 08:52:07 PM »

1930429 16:15:29 07-01-10 MFS: *CFSRES INC057 07/01/10 16:15,RESPOND RUBBISH FIRE,GOSS CT,ST PETERS MAP 2 P 7 TG182,FIRE IN A DRAIN,SAIR55 BLP211 MFS Beulah Park 211 Response

1909800 16:38:35 07-01-10 MFS: *CFSRES INC057 07/01/10 16:38,RESPOND RUBBISH FIRE,GOSS CT,ST PETERS MAP 2 P 7 TG182,STAGE END HARROW RD,SAIR55 ADL202 CFS State Air Desk

Author Topic: Interesting Fire and Emergency Related Paging (Read 4727715 times)

Darren

Darren

Darren