My opinion is that we should take the opportunity to recruit from any age group, background, etc...some will not be suitable for short or long term membership, but some will.
Should we be recruiting for response calls only and thus get the adrenalin junkie ? What about community training so that people understand the consequences of inaction and improving the skills of the community ?
SA Government is trying to get the 'community more resilient' to cope with emergencies. I agree with the strategy, so that this limits how many emergencies happen, rather than riding a truck to a persons injuries/lost/structure/etc.
Some brigades/units/etc agree with this. Look at the number of RCR demonstrations being delivered to High School students & PR displays to prevent a car accident happening.
If a person stays 6 to 12 months, they will have increased life skills. If that helps them get employment, helps them help their family, understand working as a team, the rewards (personal & community) of volunteering and prevents an emergency (eg RCR, fires, land search, etc) then fantastic.
If they walk away with a feeling that volunteering is great, they will tell on average seven other people. The message spreads. Then someone might volunteer with you or with another community organisation. Your community profiles is strengthened.
If you turn them away because of age, they will not come back & the same seven people will get negative feedback. The spreads quicker in the community than good feedback.
Yes, there are costs & time in running courses, PPE, etc. Some of this is reuseable or recoverable. Even if you get that one extra person on the truck so the truck leaves earlier for 6 months, is this not worth the life it could save or the $$$ in restricting the spread of a fire on a farm ?
A few SES Units (4 I can think of) in metro area do group inductions, so the newbies all feel part of a group. They become a team that progresses through training & thus support each other.
One of the major issues I feel is lack of information to base volunteer members.
I understand the need in operations to follow command lines, but a few younger volunteers have contacted me about procedures & lack of information in normal 'day to day' workings. They need to feel part of the whole team, they want information has to why this is being done, how will it affect them, can they assist, etc. They might not agree with the decision, but that is their choice. The 'need to know' process on information blocks too much information flow.
Also, if the social aspect of volunteering is shown, they will form more of a team & relationships with others. This friendship can keep a person in the team. But it can also backfire badly when relationships breakup.
In country areas people talk about combining emergency organisations. Here is the opportunity to do it at a local level. Combine the services (SES & CFS) with a Venturer Scout troop, youth group, Guide group, etc so they complete the emergency badge. Surely a combined SES & CFS cadet group could share funding & local resources ?
** my opinion only & not supported by others **