Author Topic: New Burnside Pumper  (Read 212414 times)

Offline Zippy

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,540
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New Burnside Pumper
« Reply #325 on: March 03, 2009, 08:26:40 AM »
http://www.ozfire.org/files/8005dii_img_2009_03_01_0388_100.jpg

http://www.ozfire.org/files/8005dii_img_2009_03_01_0389_154.jpg

Not everything cfs does is off-road...infact make it 10-20% of the work?


GREAT WORK BURNSIDE  :-)
« Last Edit: March 03, 2009, 08:33:55 AM by Zippy »

Offline Hazmat206

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 484
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Adelaide 206 respond to reduced Hazmat...
    • View Profile
Re: New Burnside Pumper
« Reply #326 on: March 03, 2009, 10:48:00 AM »
I just thought a majority of cfs trucks are built with the potential to go off road
206 to Adelaide fire,Incident #59,situation found 440, action taken 41,K45, over

misterteddy

  • Guest
Re: New Burnside Pumper
« Reply #327 on: March 03, 2009, 11:14:23 AM »
I just thought a majority of cfs trucks are built with the potential to go off road

Haz....none of the 2 wheel drive appliances the CFS have are designed to go off-road. There are plenty of Type 2 pumpers, Rescue, Hazmat and still a couple of General Pumpers that are all 2WD.

In a well rounded service there is a need for both. I'd be really keen to see a cost/benefit comparison between a Type II and the Volvo Pumper Burnside has. The need for an Urban pump does exist in some Brigades (and just needing to pump lots of water doesnt constitute a need).

Darren

  • Guest
Re: New Burnside Pumper
« Reply #328 on: March 03, 2009, 03:14:30 PM »
The cost of the Type 2 vs the Volvo would be to prohibitive, so unlikely we will ever see another one. Type was $330,000 equipped, from memory the Volvo was around $480,000 empty. Can't see CFS wanting to spend another $150,000 for what is essentially a better cab/chassis.

Offline Zippy

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,540
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New Burnside Pumper
« Reply #329 on: March 03, 2009, 03:18:21 PM »
how about this configuration:

Scania Chassis
burnside pumpers locker/body layout
Type 2's Pump. (Rosen, RH30??)

Offline tft

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 202
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New Burnside Pumper
« Reply #330 on: March 03, 2009, 04:06:11 PM »
I would love the Volvo, but at the end of the day I think the build eg pump, lockers is the most important part.
I could live with HINO and a good pump and locker layout

Darren

  • Guest
Re: New Burnside Pumper
« Reply #331 on: March 03, 2009, 04:15:57 PM »
how about this configuration:

Scania Chassis
burnside pumpers locker/body layout
Type 2's Pump. (Rosen, RH30??)

Nah the Darley pump they have is awesome, I reckon if you jumped on a CFA type 4 heavy order you would be happy.

misterteddy

  • Guest
Re: New Burnside Pumper
« Reply #332 on: March 03, 2009, 04:49:41 PM »
how about this configuration:

Scania Chassis
burnside pumpers locker/body layout
Type 2's Pump. (Rosen, RH30??)

zippy I've driven both a Volvo...and a Scania, both late models. Personally, I thought the Volvo setup was better. Don't be swayed by red-envy, theres a reason they have the Scanias, and it doesnt have too much to do with it being a better truck chassis

Offline Zippy

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,540
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New Burnside Pumper
« Reply #333 on: March 03, 2009, 05:18:56 PM »
red envy? who says im relating volvo/scania to that....more like  BA Seat EnvY!!  the CFS Standard Chassis cant provide space (and leg room) for BA Seats.

Offline Zippy

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,540
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New Burnside Pumper
« Reply #334 on: March 03, 2009, 05:24:15 PM »
how about this configuration:

Scania Chassis
burnside pumpers locker/body layout
Type 2's Pump. (Rosen, RH30??)

Nah the Darley pump they have is awesome, I reckon if you jumped on a CFA type 4 heavy order you would be happy.

Question is...would CFS...and would they be happy lol.

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: New Burnside Pumper
« Reply #335 on: March 03, 2009, 10:31:08 PM »
Question is...would CFS...and would they be happy lol.

Question is, do you know there is more to this firefighting business than Scanias and 'cool stuff'?

There is far more to building a truck than just "Wow, this looks good and everyone else uses it"

Anyway:
It's great to see that Burnside has pushed the envelope and has ended up with a very good looking piece of firefighting kit, that also happens to be functional! (Who'd have thought?) They even managed to move away from the old faithful "We all need Scanias" line of thinking.

Yeah, there are a few bits and pieces that I personally don't really like, but at the same time, there is no use getting into a shitfight about personal opinions, when the truck as a whole works well and is a monumental win for the CFS brigades and pumper design.

Any reason that the CFS still wont look into the full height rear end, like the CFA/MFB/NSWFB have dabbled with? It seems to allow a fair amount more stowage.

As I said, well done to Burnside, it has certainly shown the rest of the state what is achievable in terms of appliance design. If only we could all end up with such a shithot looking truck.

(Just don't tell anyone who used CoQ as a justification for the pumper that the thing still can't supply a Bronto ;))
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

Offline Mike

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,045
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New Burnside Pumper
« Reply #336 on: March 04, 2009, 07:17:15 AM »
It certainly appears to be quite functional, however ill reserve my opinion for when i actually see it stowed.

Some may think im a little sick, but the checker doesnt look that bad....

Top effort by all involved :)

Offline jaff

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 848
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New Burnside Pumper
« Reply #337 on: March 04, 2009, 08:45:34 AM »
It certainly appears to be quite functional, however ill reserve my opinion for when i actually see it stowed.

Some may think im a little sick, but the checker doesnt look that bad....

Top effort by all involved :)




"NO MIKE" we dont think that your a little sick....... bordering on retarded..yeh! :-D
Just Another Filtered Fireman

Offline Gungellan34

  • Forum Recruit
  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Burnside Pumper
« Reply #338 on: March 04, 2009, 08:46:12 AM »
Even looks like a real firetruck!
Not a council truck :-D
Just my opinion, but I'd like to hear yours!

Offline Zippy

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,540
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Burnside Pumper
« Reply #339 on: March 04, 2009, 09:11:08 AM »
exactly :D

Offline Mike

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,045
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New Burnside Pumper
« Reply #340 on: March 04, 2009, 09:48:49 AM »
"NO MIKE" we dont think that your a little sick....... bordering on retarded..yeh! :-D

 :-P  :-)

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: Burnside Pumper
« Reply #341 on: March 04, 2009, 10:43:30 AM »
Even looks like a real firetruck!
Not a council truck :-D

Oh, in what magical place do you live in?

Firetrucks are RED, Council trucks are WHITE! :P
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

Offline Zippy

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,540
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Burnside Pumper
« Reply #342 on: March 04, 2009, 12:47:33 PM »
Quote
Firetrucks are RED, Council trucks are WHITE!

Correct me if im wrong, but the main reason behind our trucks being White is Ash Wednesday and the Rate of new appliances built...not enough time to get them painted Red?

Wonder what the 2009 Emergency Fire service would be like in SA?

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: Burnside Pumper
« Reply #343 on: March 04, 2009, 12:58:10 PM »
Correct me if im wrong, but the main reason behind our trucks being White is Ash Wednesday and the Rate of new appliances built...not enough time to get them painted Red?

Wonder what the 2009 Emergency Fire service would be like in SA?

Not enough time to paint trucks red? Hahaha, congrats on taking that one hook, line and sinker.

While you're at it, can you get me a long stand and a left handed screwdriver?
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

Offline Shiner

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Burnside Pumper
« Reply #344 on: March 04, 2009, 01:00:14 PM »
Good to see everyone wearing appropriate PPE with good traffic control in place in the photo above :roll:

Nice looking truck and the battenburg deffo works when out and about, have experienced it on the freeway several times now.
Jason
Swanport Group DGO - Region 3
Jervois CFS Brigade - "Home of the Original Hooker!"

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: Burnside Pumper
« Reply #345 on: March 04, 2009, 01:25:47 PM »
Good to see everyone wearing appropriate PPE with good traffic control in place in the photo above :roll:

How are those sour grapes treating you?
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

Offline Shiner

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Burnside Pumper
« Reply #346 on: March 04, 2009, 01:41:28 PM »
I'd make the same comment no matter what brigade, appliance, situation.  This forum is a public one, the photo is viewable by anyone/everyone, surely we should try and do the 'right' thing in the public eye?

Regardless of that and being in no way up to speed with the politics etc that have followed this around, the truck looks fantastic and should easily be up to the jobs it will be put to.

I can however relate to the brigades position and some of the negative and positive reactions and comments being a member of the brigade that houses the Region 3 Hook Truck come Tanker.......
Jason
Swanport Group DGO - Region 3
Jervois CFS Brigade - "Home of the Original Hooker!"

Offline Zippy

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,540
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Burnside Pumper
« Reply #347 on: March 04, 2009, 01:45:08 PM »
It'll be a awesome crowd control vehicle in the *future*...for when recession/depression hits.   :evil:  :mrgreen:  :-)

Offline bittenyakka

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,342
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New Burnside Pumper
« Reply #348 on: March 04, 2009, 05:22:03 PM »
What kind of supply does a Bronto actually require? Doesn;t it depend on how much water they want at the tip? and sometimes how much water you can actually get?

Offline SA Firey

  • Forum Group Officer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,967
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New Burnside Pumper
« Reply #349 on: March 04, 2009, 05:39:47 PM »
Anyone see CH7 News tonight....were Dads Army are'nt we, but Arthur hinted at brigades able to do their own buildups for "smaller appliances" :wink:
Images are copyright

 

anything