Poll

Should CFS be Paid For COQ in MFS stations?

Yes
11 (30.6%)
No
25 (69.4%)

Total Members Voted: 34

Author Topic: Should CFS be Paid For COQ?  (Read 20496 times)

Offline RescueHazmat

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,174
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Should CFS be Paid For COQ?
« Reply #50 on: March 06, 2007, 05:58:19 PM »
CFS also have a flashood training demonstration / pratical..

Offline CFS_Firey

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,250
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Should CFS be Paid For COQ?
« Reply #51 on: March 08, 2007, 01:35:55 PM »
Just our of curiosity, how do they build new fire stations without poles?  Single story? Fast lifts?

Offline Pipster

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,269
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Should CFS be Paid For COQ?
« Reply #52 on: March 08, 2007, 01:47:05 PM »
Single story....new stations built in the last 5 years include Golden Grove (well, Surrey Downs actually, but they call it Golden Grove), and Elizabeth (rebuilt on same location as the old one).

Both are single story......

Pip

There are three types of people in the world.  Those that watch things happen, those who make things happen, and those who wonder what happened.

Offline CFS_Firey

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,250
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Should CFS be Paid For COQ?
« Reply #53 on: March 08, 2007, 01:50:06 PM »
What next?  Maybe they'll start sending another service to cats up trees... It could be the end of the fire service!

Offline SA Firey

  • Forum Group Officer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,967
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Should CFS be Paid For COQ?
« Reply #54 on: March 10, 2007, 07:13:03 AM »
CFS and MFS already go to cats up trees,birds up trees(yeah I know what your thinking but we have been responded to those)all because the RSPCA is too lazy to do it.

A cat up a tree for example usually beyond reach of our ladders, and so what do you do out a bowl of Whiskas at the bottom :lol: 
Images are copyright

Offline Scania_1

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 443
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Should CFS be Paid For COQ?
« Reply #55 on: March 10, 2007, 07:45:57 AM »
HP line on jet.

Offline SA Firey

  • Forum Group Officer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,967
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Should CFS be Paid For COQ?
« Reply #56 on: March 10, 2007, 08:02:28 AM »
HP line on jet.

I didnt want to say extinguished with a 64mm line :-P
Images are copyright

Offline Blue

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Should CFS be Paid For COQ?
« Reply #57 on: March 10, 2007, 10:46:06 AM »
HP line on jet.

I didnt want to say extinguished with a 64mm line :-P

Could have sworn the cat was on fire, Sir  :roll:

Offline CFS_Firey

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,250
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Should CFS be Paid For COQ?
« Reply #58 on: March 10, 2007, 12:51:02 PM »
CFS and MFS already go to cats up trees,birds up trees(yeah I know what your thinking but we have been responded to those)all because the RSPCA is too lazy to do it.

A cat up a tree for example usually beyond reach of our ladders, and so what do you do out a bowl of Whiskas at the bottom :lol: 

I was actually referring to the fact that MFS no longer respond the fire service to animal rescues - they all go through the SES now...

Offline 24P

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 411
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Should CFS be Paid For COQ?
« Reply #59 on: March 10, 2007, 03:09:30 PM »

I was actually referring to the fact that MFS no longer respond the fire service to animal rescues - they all go through the SES now...
Providing they have changed the database  :wink:
Don't look back. Something might be gaining on you.