Murray Bridge's new Pumper

Started by djwiz, September 13, 2006, 02:51:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2
User actions

oz fire

#25
September 18, 2006, 10:43:52 AM
Quote from: 24P on September 15, 2006, 06:09:23 PM
Quote from: oz fire on September 15, 2006, 12:53:10 PM

At least Murray Bridge have large and expanding industry in their primary response area for which they are responsible! Their urban/industrial risks are increasing.

Thats easy fixed, give the area to the MFS then they wont need it.

Yea right - trying to keep MFS inside their boundaries across the state is hard enough!

At least MB CFS can respond with a crew each time thier pagers are activated - not the same can be said for another service in Murray Bridge.

As for giving areas away - better to start that in town first rather than looking in country areas!
Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the ability to control it.

probie_boy

#26
September 18, 2006, 12:36:34 PM
mmm, the southern suburbs and mt barker issues are bigger fish to fry for the MFS at the moment.

murray bridge need a pumper, purely for the fact that backing up the MFS. next nearest pumping resource is mt barker.......or jervois tanker! :evil:

medevac

#27
September 20, 2006, 08:46:39 AM
Quote from: oz fire on September 18, 2006, 10:43:52 AM

Yea right - trying to keep MFS inside their boundaries across the state is hard enough!


lol - did anyone else notice pt lincoln MFS get paged to a grassie 30km north of Lincoln... LMAO; someone had there brain in neutral when they sent that response...

24P

#28
September 27, 2006, 07:17:50 PM
Murray bridge must be getting close to getting it, saw it at NE Isuzu today as i was passing thru.
Don't look back. Something might be gaining on you.

rescue5271

#29
September 27, 2006, 07:31:24 PM
I did have someone tell me that they get it in two weeks???

24P

#30
September 27, 2006, 08:07:56 PM
fine looking machine i must say though.
Don't look back. Something might be gaining on you.

rescue5271

#31
September 28, 2006, 05:47:30 AM
Was talking to a CFA staff member the other day he was saying that they want to go back to mid mount pumps with 90 meter twin hose lines on all new pumpers. If that is the case then they are looking at getting a hell of alot of new pumpers....

Toast

#32
September 28, 2006, 11:51:41 AM
Thank god... Now if only that sense would filter accross to us.

Firey9119

#33
September 30, 2006, 06:50:45 PM
has anyone got any photos of the appliance?
Phillip H
Salisbury CFS (Para Group)
FireFighter
(Firey9119)

24P

#34
September 30, 2006, 08:17:15 PM
Quote from: rescue5271 on September 28, 2006, 05:47:30 AM
Was talking to a CFA staff member the other day he was saying that they want to go back to mid mount pumps with 90 meter twin hose lines on all new pumpers. If that is the case then they are looking at getting a filtered of alot of new pumpers....
Maybe the CFS can buy up the type 2's for a bargain price?
Don't look back. Something might be gaining on you.

SA Firey

#35
September 30, 2006, 10:00:27 PM
Quote from: Firey9119 on September 30, 2006, 06:50:45 PM
has anyone got any photos of the appliance?

Looks like this :-D
Images are copyright

TillerMan

#36
October 16, 2006, 11:33:53 AM
You do realise that Pt lincoln MFS's area goes 40KM's around Pt lincoln.

medevac

#37
October 16, 2006, 08:53:50 PM
there are currently some photos of murray bridge pumper on ozfire... prior to delivery
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2
User actions