« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Aircraft in trouble at Kingston SE  (Read 4231 times)

Offline bajdas

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,745
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Aircraft in trouble at Kingston SE
« on: July 12, 2006, 02:30:10 PM »
13:42:45 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: KINGSTON RESPOND AIRCRAFT IN TROUBLE - KINGSTON AIRSTRIP - ETA TO KINGSTON 5MINS > 12/07/2006 13:42:36

13:49:20 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: ROBE RESPOND AIRCRAFT IN TROUBLE - KINGSTON AIRSTRIP - ETA TO KINGSTON 5MINS - DEFAULT FOR KINGSTON > 12/07/2006 13:49:11

13:51:33 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: MT BENSON RESPOND AIRCRAFT IN TROUBLE - KINGSTON AIRSTRIP - ETA TO KINGSTON 5MINS - DEFAULT FOR KINGSTON > 12/07/2006 13:51:24
Logged
Andrew Macmichael
lives at Pt Noarlunga South.

My personal opinion only.

Offline bajdas

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,745
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Aircraft in trouble at Kingston SE
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2006, 02:31:44 PM »
13:57:58 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: KINGSTON, MT BENSON & ROBE STOP FOR CALL. PLANE HAS LANDED SAFELY - FROM SAPOL > 12/07/2006 13:57:50

13:58:07 12-07-06 MFS: PLANE IS SAFELY DOWN,CONTACT MFS IF YOU RECEIVED CALL
« Last Edit: July 12, 2006, 02:33:22 PM by bajdas »
Logged
Andrew Macmichael
lives at Pt Noarlunga South.

My personal opinion only.

Offline bajdas

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,745
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Aircraft in trouble at Kingston SE
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2006, 02:32:46 PM »
This would be an interesting scenario for training purposes. So many hazards, response types, etc to consider if the aircraft had crashed.
Logged
Andrew Macmichael
lives at Pt Noarlunga South.

My personal opinion only.

Offline medevac

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,659
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Aircraft in trouble at Kingston SE
« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2006, 09:02:09 PM »
Quote from: bajdas on July 12, 2006, 02:31:44 PM

13:58:07 12-07-06 MFS: PLANE IS SAFELY DOWN,CONTACT MFS IF YOU RECEIVED CALL

i am curious about this page, considering that per the decoder there werent any SES or MFS responding... anyone know?
Logged

rescue5271

  • Guest
Re: Aircraft in trouble at Kingston SE
« Reply #4 on: July 12, 2006, 09:14:23 PM »
SES where paged as they are rescue for kingston,stop call was placed well before anyone brigade's arrived,was sitting in our radio room when this job started....
Logged

Offline medevac

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,659
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Aircraft in trouble at Kingston SE
« Reply #5 on: July 12, 2006, 10:52:30 PM »
dont tell me the decoder isnt gospel...  :-o
Logged

Offline Alan (Big Al)

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,609
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • CRUMPETS
    • View Profile
Re: Aircraft in trouble at Kingston SE
« Reply #6 on: July 13, 2006, 12:11:42 AM »
was at the station when the job went down as well but the Kingston SES controller was asking if an original page was sent because their unit had only recieved stop call page??? Might be wrong though
Logged
Lt. Goolwa CFS

Offline medevac

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,659
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Aircraft in trouble at Kingston SE
« Reply #7 on: July 13, 2006, 12:38:09 AM »
sounds liek someone filtered up
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

anything