Aircraft in trouble at Kingston SE

[bajdas]

13:42:45 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: KINGSTON RESPOND AIRCRAFT IN TROUBLE - KINGSTON AIRSTRIP - ETA TO KINGSTON 5MINS > 12/07/2006 13:42:36

13:49:20 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: ROBE RESPOND AIRCRAFT IN TROUBLE - KINGSTON AIRSTRIP - ETA TO KINGSTON 5MINS - DEFAULT FOR KINGSTON > 12/07/2006 13:49:11

13:51:33 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: MT BENSON RESPOND AIRCRAFT IN TROUBLE - KINGSTON AIRSTRIP - ETA TO KINGSTON 5MINS - DEFAULT FOR KINGSTON > 12/07/2006 13:51:24

[bajdas]

13:57:58 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: KINGSTON, MT BENSON & ROBE STOP FOR CALL. PLANE HAS LANDED SAFELY - FROM SAPOL > 12/07/2006 13:57:50

13:58:07 12-07-06 MFS: PLANE IS SAFELY DOWN,CONTACT MFS IF YOU RECEIVED CALL

[bajdas]

This would be an interesting scenario for training purposes. So many hazards, response types, etc to consider if the aircraft had crashed.

[medevac]

13:58:07 12-07-06 MFS: PLANE IS SAFELY DOWN,CONTACT MFS IF YOU RECEIVED CALL

i am curious about this page, considering that per the decoder there werent any SES or MFS responding... anyone know?

[rescue5271]

SES where paged as they are rescue for kingston,stop call was placed well before anyone brigade's arrived,was sitting in our radio room when this job started....

[medevac]

dont tell me the decoder isnt gospel...  :-o

[Alan (Big Al)]

was at the station when the job went down as well but the Kingston SES controller was asking if an original page was sent because their unit had only recieved stop call page??? Might be wrong though

[medevac]

sounds liek someone filtered up