General Discussion > Other Government Agencies

A piece of history...

<< < (16/17) > >>

bajdas:

--- Quote from: rescue5271 on April 26, 2006, 04:35:00 PM ---May be CFS should train SES???? and tell me where does it say that you have to be in a RCR brigade to do the RCR course?????

--- End quote ---

Personnally a course the same would be great, but I have seen the SES Training Resource Kit which requires that Basic Rescue and other tools courses to have already been completed.

Thus I would assume the pre-requisites (Basic Fire Fighter ??)for CFS are different, thus the courses not compatable.

Pity one of the services (MFS, CFS or SES) did not do a 'bridging type course' so that course pre-requisites are the same, thus RCR course would be the same.

Oh well, maybe opportunity missed....maybe an SES person picking up a hose would have created more of a storm....

"My thoughts only"

medevac:

--- Quote from: P F on April 26, 2006, 04:37:26 PM ---Be funny if I get into MFS though still being CFS.  RCR trained, HAZMAT, rescue and all sorts of other stuff you get trained for but never being able to use it for the CFS brigade. :lol:

--- End quote ---

HMMM but there is RPL between CFS & MFS... just not SES.

CFS_Firey:
Back to the topic about SES responses being longer because members live further away; how does that excuse a long response time? Even if their members lived at the station, CFS could still get to an incident first, because of the distance SES has to travel to get there.
The only the SES could have similar response times to CFS is to have the an SES unit in every town with the CFS.
Personally, if I was the patient that required lifting, and had to wait an extra 15 minutes for the SES, when the fire station is just down the road, I'd be asking questions...
Shouldn't the closest resource be responded regardless of what service?

bajdas:

--- Quote from: CFS_firey on April 27, 2006, 03:41:28 PM ---Back to the topic about SES responses being longer because members live further away; how does that excuse a long response time? Even if their members lived at the station, CFS could still get to an incident first, because of the distance SES has to travel to get there.
The only the SES could have similar response times to CFS is to have the an SES unit in every town with the CFS.
Personally, if I was the patient that required lifting, and had to wait an extra 15 minutes for the SES, when the fire station is just down the road, I'd be asking questions...
Shouldn't the closest resource be responded regardless of what service?

--- End quote ---

I believe that is what is happening and personally I hope that is what will happen !!!  For example:-

13:42:07 27-04-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: MORGAN RESPOND PATIENT LIFT, RAILWAY TCE, MORGAN - ASSIST SAAS WITH LIFT FROM HOUSEBOAT CALLED THE MURRAY MIRANDA, 100M UPSTREAM FROM FERRY

01:16:56 27-04-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: PASKEVILLE RESPOND ASSIST SAAS WITH PATIENT LIFT. 74 RAILWAY TCE, PASKEVILLE. SAAS ON SCENE. < 27/04/2006 01:16:44

23:46:47 26-04-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: GOOLWA RESPOND ASSIST SAAS WITH PATIENT LIFT. UNIT 2 NO 13 BROOKING ST, GOOLWA. SAAS ON SCENE... < 26/04/2006 23:46:35

CFS_Firey:
Good good :)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version