Ammusing pager message.

[Manuel]

yea i agree it was not that big, but yea for my second fire, yea it was big. but KI was big :evil: and i went there

[firetruck]

yea i agree it was not that big, but yea for my second fire, yea it was big. but KI was big :evil: and i went there

the top posters board is just days away.......

[corecutters]

yea i agree it was not that big, but yea for my second fire, yea it was big. but KI was big :evil: and i went there

Just out of interest, what is the latest rules / requirements for Strike Team deployments, regarding age, training and active service?


Thanks.

[Toast]

I do not want to wait around a few years before i can get some.

Its ok buddy. You don't have to wait around. You're just down the road from Barker?

(HINT: Take some money with you, it will probably help)

[standpipe]

(spelling),

    ?

[medevac]

cos he doesnt know how to spell COOMANDOOK

[PF_]

or murrAy bridge  :-P

[Manuel]

stop paying out my spelolling, mey speel check is not worcing.  :roll:

[medevac]

And i do kind of wonder what "eyre ply" was meant to be ??? presumably eyre peninsula....





were just shittin' ya

[Manuel]

ok back on topic :-D

   SHQ: CFSRES YORKETOWN RESPOND 12 VICTORIA STREET, YORKETOWN - CHILD WITH FINGERS STUCK IN DRAIN, BADLY SWOLLEN - SAAS ON SCENE < 5/08/2006 00:11:36

WTF, that gotta hurt

[CFS_Firey]

SHQ: CFSRES PT WAKEFIELD RESPOND MVA HWY ONE, LOCHIEL, , 20 KMS NORTH PT WAKEFIELD , CAR ROLLOVER, 3RD DEFAULT, ALSO NO RESPONSE FROM SES < 4/08/2006 00:59:43 CFS - Wakefield Plains Group

I hope it wasn't bad.. :|

[corecutters]

30 kms north of Pt Wakefield... Isn't that in Pt Wakefields Rescue area anyway ? ... Im guessing no was was reported trapped though as it was only a response to an MVA, not an RCR.


CC

[Toast]

Confirmed MFA from SAPol, page came out a little later...

[corecutters]

MFS: RESPOND RCR 05/08/06 01:49,SYCAMORE RD,MT GAMBIER, MAP 0 0 0 ,,FROM MT GAMBIER POLICE CAR V TREE NO PERSONS TRAPPED,74629 701*CFSRES


So why were SES responded?

[CFS_Firey]

This one from a few weeks ago;

MFS: RESPOND Vehicle Accident 08/07/06 22:44,MT BARKER RD,BRIDGEWATER, MAP 146 F 15 ,,FROM POLICE - MINOR ACCIDENT - NO ENTRAPMENT - NO SPILL - NO CLEANUP REQUIRED- POLICE MESSAGE NO 1128,9019 8924*CFSRES:

Why was anyone responded, let alone 2 brigades?

[Robert-Robert34]

Heres another one from early this arvo :wink:

1909290 12:23:20 05-08-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: NARACOORTE RESPOND MVA, JONES ST, NARACOORTE CNR OF SMITH STREET. NO FURTHER DETAILS... < 

I wonder if our mate Blinky responded to it  :-D

[Toast]

Jones and Smith St. eh? Sounds like someone became bored with making up street names.

[Camo]

SES are still responded because:

1) There could be another car that was missed that could have someone trapped.

2) Traffic control

Camo

[PF_]

This one from a few weeks ago;

MFS: RESPOND Vehicle Accident 08/07/06 22:44,MT BARKER RD,BRIDGEWATER, MAP 146 F 15 ,,FROM POLICE - MINOR ACCIDENT - NO ENTRAPMENT - NO SPILL - NO CLEANUP REQUIRED- POLICE MESSAGE NO 1128,9019 8924*CFSRES:

Why was anyone responded, let alone 2 brigades?

Maybe someone involved was under shock and made it seem worse when they called 000, no idea  :?

[rescue5271]

Two car MVA was outside the new baker did traffice control and clean up..call was a pass a by call into the station....

[corecutters]

SES are still responded because:

1) There could be another car that was missed that could have someone trapped.

2) Traffic control

Camo

Understandanly... But with SAPOL on scene you would presume traffic control would be their responsibility, and with it being Car vs Tree, No entrapments specifically identified -(From SAPOL), and with Mt Gambier MFS attending, to me it is a wasted resource...

If it were a rescue, I would understand.. but yea... Im guessing they were stopped prior to arrival??  - Senior F/Fighter70 , any ideas?

[F.B.R.T]

They make their own rules!!

I don't think they take stop calls from any other service.

Most the time when we are dispatched we know if there are any entrapments from comms.

I often think if in doubt, call them,(as per road crash rescue resource directory) but if a service on scene(e.g. Police) says that there is no entrapment and that they have traffic control under control, then they probably don't need to be there.

A fire service whether it be SACFS or SAMFS should still attend to make seen safe and clean up as that is a role police don't perform and nor should they have to.

Anyway, my opinion only, but I would be interested to see what others think!

[corecutters]

^ Couldn't agree more or have said it better myself !!





CC

[Camo]

They make their own rules!!

I don't think they take stop calls from any other service.

Most the time when we are dispatched we know if there are any entrapments from comms.

I often think if in doubt, call them,(as per road crash rescue resource directory) but if a service on scene(e.g. Police) says that there is no entrapment and that they have traffic control under control, then they probably don't need to be there.

A fire service whether it be SACFS or SAMFS should still attend to make seen safe and clean up as that is a role police don't perform and nor should they have to.

Anyway, my opinion only, but I would be interested to see what others think!

But we cant go diddling them out of call outs....they will think its a big conspiracy to make them redundant!

[medevac]

and here i was thinking everyone had a fairly basic (at least) understanding of incident responses...

per the RCR Resource Directory; police, SAAS, fire and rescue must be responded to ALL motor vehicle related accidents outside the metropolitan area.

its a good read that some ppl obviously need to take a look at??  :roll: