« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Stirling / Piccadilly Amalgamation  (Read 7494 times)

Offline Darcyq

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 81
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Stirling / Piccadilly Amalgamation
« on: May 31, 2012, 03:58:41 PM »
31-05-12 14:29:49 COMMENCING AT 19:30 HOURS DISCUSS OFFER TO AMALGAMATE HAVE YOUR SAY AS A DECISION HAS TO BE MADE JOHN - CFS Piccadilly Info

What the?
Logged

pumprescue

  • Guest
Stirling / Piccadilly Amalgamation
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2012, 04:21:22 PM »
Stirling might have something to do with it, both need new stations.
Logged

Offline CFS_Firey

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,250
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Stirling / Piccadilly Amalgamation
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2012, 04:54:54 PM »
Quote from: pumprescue on May 31, 2012, 04:21:22 PM
Stirling might have something to do with it, both need new stations.

Correct.
Logged

Offline Darcyq

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 81
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Stirling / Piccadilly Amalgamation
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2012, 08:01:20 PM »
Interesting, at least it might stop the confusion SACAD has between Stirling and Stirling North. So the two are joined one and become "Crafers CFS".  :wink:
Logged

Offline safireservice

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Stirling / Piccadilly Amalgamation
« Reply #4 on: June 03, 2012, 11:39:32 AM »
Quote from: Darcyq on May 31, 2012, 08:01:20 PM
Interesting, at least it might stop the confusion SACAD has between Stirling and Stirling North. So the two are joined one and become "Crafers CFS".  :wink:
Thats not a SACAD problem, more like operator error.
Logged
Treat everyone as if they are an idiot, until they prove you otherwise.

Offline FlameTrees

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Stirling / Piccadilly Amalgamation
« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2012, 12:47:35 PM »
Oh I see.

When it suits Stirling, they sook to the media about how being forced to relocate to another location will "add valuable minutes to a response time".

But, as it suits them now, offer to merge Picadilly into them, so the residents of Picadilly then get a reduced response time.

Hmmm......
Logged
"is that negative as in yes, or negative as in no" - actual radio transmission from the field.......

Offline CFS_Firey

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,250
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Stirling / Piccadilly Amalgamation
« Reply #6 on: June 04, 2012, 04:48:07 PM »
Quote from: FlameTrees on June 04, 2012, 12:47:35 PM
Oh I see.

When it suits Stirling, they sook to the media about how being forced to relocate to another location will "add valuable minutes to a response time".

But, as it suits them now, offer to merge Picadilly into them, so the residents of Picadilly then get a reduced response time.

Hmmm......

What makes you think it's being instigated by Stirling?
Logged

Offline crossy

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 86
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Stirling / Piccadilly Amalgamation
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2012, 05:05:37 PM »
Anybody know the reason for the merger?
Logged
cant prove it?? then i didnt do it......

Offline bittenyakka

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,342
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Stirling / Piccadilly Amalgamation
« Reply #8 on: June 04, 2012, 06:42:28 PM »
Hummm interesting
Logged

Offline Bagyassfirey

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 891
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Stirling / Piccadilly Amalgamation
« Reply #9 on: June 11, 2012, 01:35:02 PM »
Anyone actually got some solid facts on this?
Logged

Offline bittenyakka

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,342
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Stirling / Piccadilly Amalgamation
« Reply #10 on: June 13, 2012, 09:47:36 PM »
Nothing is happening for now
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »