Stirling / Piccadilly Amalgamation

[Darcyq]

31-05-12 14:29:49 COMMENCING AT 19:30 HOURS DISCUSS OFFER TO AMALGAMATE HAVE YOUR SAY AS A DECISION HAS TO BE MADE JOHN - CFS Piccadilly Info

What the?

[pumprescue]

Stirling might have something to do with it, both need new stations.

[CFS_Firey]

Stirling might have something to do with it, both need new stations.

Correct.

[Darcyq]

Interesting, at least it might stop the confusion SACAD has between Stirling and Stirling North. So the two are joined one and become "Crafers CFS".  :wink:

[safireservice]

Interesting, at least it might stop the confusion SACAD has between Stirling and Stirling North. So the two are joined one and become "Crafers CFS".  :wink:

Thats not a SACAD problem, more like operator error.

[FlameTrees]

Oh I see.

When it suits Stirling, they sook to the media about how being forced to relocate to another location will "add valuable minutes to a response time".

But, as it suits them now, offer to merge Picadilly into them, so the residents of Picadilly then get a reduced response time.

Hmmm......

[CFS_Firey]

Oh I see.

When it suits Stirling, they sook to the media about how being forced to relocate to another location will "add valuable minutes to a response time".

But, as it suits them now, offer to merge Picadilly into them, so the residents of Picadilly then get a reduced response time.

Hmmm......

What makes you think it's being instigated by Stirling?

[crossy]

Anybody know the reason for the merger?

[bittenyakka]

Hummm interesting

[Bagyassfirey]

Anyone actually got some solid facts on this?

[bittenyakka]

Nothing is happening for now