Technical Discussion > HAZMAT

First alarm response

<< < (2/3) > >>

matthew:
More like one paid staffer who 'knew' better.  Not entirely the fault of CFS.  Of course the CFS could have stopped it when the issue was raised.

Darius:
so bit of an obvious question but..... how come it's ok to have a SACAD response that doesn't conform to the SOP in one incident type but not in any others?  so obviously SOPs are just guidelines after all then.

6739264:
Do we then further ask about responses that come out with ==Alarm level updated to 2== but don't actually consist of a 2nd Alarm assignment?

Alex:

--- Quote from: 6739264 on December 10, 2011, 10:58:52 AM ---Do we then further ask about responses that come out with ==Alarm level updated to 2== but don't actually consist of a 2nd Alarm assignment?

--- End quote ---

What kind of incident was that for?

pumprescue:
I have seen a large number come out with trucks taken off because brigade stations or group officers dictated to AF how the responses should happen.

But I believe numbers is getting at the fact that when a hazmat is upgraded to 2nd alarm you still haven't got a 2nd alarm per CFS SOP's.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page