Author Topic: Heavy Pumper  (Read 30735 times)

Offline SA Firey

  • Forum Group Officer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,967
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Heavy Pumper
« on: April 07, 2011, 09:08:29 AM »
The new IVECO heavy pumper in New Zealand, coming to a brigade near you.....fact or fiction :-D
Images are copyright

Offline JJD

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 92
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #1 on: April 07, 2011, 09:58:04 AM »
Something like this?

(Thanks fireenginephotos!!!!)
Hmmm, a large unused document that is extremely important, but knowone knows what is in it or what it does.

Must be related to some sort of government department... - Footy


Judge me on the service....not my payslip - misterteddy

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #2 on: April 07, 2011, 07:49:37 PM »
Will we see one in Aus before we see a Rosenbauer AT?

WHO KNOWS?!?!
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

Offline SA Firey

  • Forum Group Officer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,967
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #3 on: April 07, 2011, 10:02:14 PM »
Will we see one in Aus before we see a Rosenbauer AT?

WHO KNOWS?!?!

Yes is the word.
Images are copyright

pumprescue

  • Guest
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2011, 07:58:34 AM »
A : Its not a heavy pumper - its a medium - single stage pump 750 GPM pump (assuming they stuck with the specs from NZ, which CFS never change see the NSWFB Type 2)

B : That picture is the NZFS type 1 - which is a light pumper 500 GPM pump.


So basically its what we were already buying, but on an Iveco cab/chassis

IN NO WAY IS IT A HEAVY PUMPER (which is sad) If you speak to the NZFS these don't go to stations that need to boost, and if they do need to boost they will get a heavy pumper and these are usually used as Rescue pumps, as the stowage layout is ideal for a rescue pump.

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2011, 09:35:39 AM »
Will we see one in Aus before we see a Rosenbauer AT?

WHO KNOWS?!?!

Yes is the word.

Sounds like it'll come down to a delivery date race...
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

Offline jason

  • Forum Firefighter
  • **
  • Posts: 40
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #6 on: April 08, 2011, 09:48:23 AM »
So sounds like CFS may have brought 2 new pumpers. So who will be the lucky brigade? Who can justify one??

pumprescue

  • Guest
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #7 on: April 08, 2011, 10:38:08 AM »
Hmmmm don't know about 2, but the NZ is sounding on the cars....as for who gets it, think who has the biggest jallopy pumper right now.....

pumprescue

  • Guest
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #8 on: April 08, 2011, 03:25:43 PM »
Further more, does anyone know of another order piggy backed of NSW for a type 2?

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #9 on: April 08, 2011, 04:17:24 PM »
So sounds like CFS may have brought 2 new pumpers. So who will be the lucky brigade? Who can justify one??

Notice I said "Aus" not "South Aus"

Hmmmm don't know about 2, but the NZ is sounding on the cars....as for who gets it, think who has the biggest jallopy pumper right now.....

Hmmm..... Lets think about that... hmmmm...

Further more, does anyone know of another order piggy backed of NSW for a type 2?

God, you'd hope so. Or maybe they should piggy back a handful of Class 3's?
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

Offline safireservice

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #10 on: April 09, 2011, 10:48:51 AM »
So the CFS gets another 1 off pumper, nothing new there.
Treat everyone as if they are an idiot, until they prove you otherwise.

Offline safireservice

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #11 on: April 09, 2011, 10:50:43 AM »
Further more, does anyone know of another order piggy backed of NSW for a type 2?
What for probably 2? I think they should really bite the bullet and get at least 10 of these to fill some gaps.
Treat everyone as if they are an idiot, until they prove you otherwise.

Offline smiff77

  • Forum Recruit
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #12 on: April 10, 2011, 02:05:16 PM »
So how many true pumps in SACFS?, and who deserves to get one based on risk?

Offline Pipster

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,269
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #13 on: April 10, 2011, 03:53:20 PM »
As in heavy pumps? 

Two - Morphett Vale & Burnside - based on the premise of a heavy pumper being capable of pumping 1000 gpm (or around or 3785 lpm)

Pip
There are three types of people in the world.  Those that watch things happen, those who make things happen, and those who wonder what happened.

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #14 on: April 10, 2011, 05:02:09 PM »
So how many true pumps in SACFS?, and who deserves to get one based on risk?

SACFS don't have a designation for a Heavy Pumper.

Anything "Type 2" Pumper and higher meets the requirements for an "Urban Pumper", according to SACFS. As Pip has said, its generally understood that a "Heavy" pumper can spit out 1000gpm. If you look around the country at other services "Ultra Large" and "Super Pumpers" they dwarf the capacity of anything the CFS calls a pumper. (Not that CFS need anything like that, its more for interests sake)

Does a 34P Tanker with Urban Stowage meet the CFS definition of an "Urban Pumper"?

Light Pumper - 1000L/m @ 700kpa
Medium Pumper - 2000L/m @ 700kpa
Urban Pumper - 3000L/m @ 700kpa
24P Tanker - 2000L/m @ [Unspecified] kpa
34P Tanker - 3000L/m @ [Unspecified] kpa
(All shamelessly ripped from the Oct 2010 SOP's Glossary, I really hope there is a better definition out there?)

I do love the manner in which CFS rate their pumps to the recommended operating pressure of the branch, rather than to a figure closer to 'normal' pump operating pressures, say 1000kpa?
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

Offline safireservice

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #15 on: April 18, 2011, 05:13:58 PM »
So any more to the rumour mill?
Treat everyone as if they are an idiot, until they prove you otherwise.

Offline smiff77

  • Forum Recruit
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #16 on: April 18, 2011, 06:07:56 PM »
So how many true pumps in SACFS?, and who deserves to get one based on risk?

SACFS don't have a designation for a Heavy Pumper.

Anything "Type 2" Pumper and higher meets the requirements for an "Urban Pumper", according to SACFS. As Pip has said, its generally understood that a "Heavy" pumper can spit out 1000gpm. If you look around the country at other services "Ultra Large" and "Super Pumpers" they dwarf the capacity of anything the CFS calls a pumper. (Not that CFS need anything like that, its more for interests sake)

Does a 34P Tanker with Urban Stowage meet the CFS definition of an "Urban Pumper"?

Light Pumper - 1000L/m @ 700kpa
Medium Pumper - 2000L/m @ 700kpa
Urban Pumper - 3000L/m @ 700kpa
24P Tanker - 2000L/m @ [Unspecified] kpa
34P Tanker - 3000L/m @ [Unspecified] kpa
(All shamelessly ripped from the Oct 2010 SOP's Glossary, I really hope there is a better definition out there?)

I do love the manner in which CFS rate their pumps to the recommended operating pressure of the branch, rather than to a figure closer to 'normal' pump operating pressures, say 1000kpa?

How about,how many pumpers  with over 3000lpm capacity?.  I see a number of Isuzus similar to CFA and FRNSW.

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #17 on: April 19, 2011, 01:23:51 AM »
How about,how many pumpers  with over 3000lpm capacity?.  I see a number of Isuzu's similar to CFA and FRNSW.

The Isuzu's are the FRNSW Type 2 Build. There are 6 of them off the top of my head, at Murray Bridge, Millicent, Happy Valley, Mount Barker, Hahndorf and Eden Hills. They have the Rosenbauer NH30 pump, rated to 3000lpm/ 1000kpa.

As for pumpers "Over 3000lpm/1000kpa" you'd be looking at million dollar abomination that is The Dennis at Morphett Vale, the slightly bent, but still "new" Volvo at Burnside and the other million dollar lemon Pumper at Stirling. All three of these were prototype builds/buys and the only one that operated as a fire truck should have from day one was Burnside's Volvo. The Dennis and the Isuzu at Stirling have cost hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars to continually patch. They finally solved both problems with the Dennis looking to be scraped, and Stirling's pumper getting a MAJOR refit, pump and all last year.

"Heavy" Pumpers and the SACFS have a rather rocky relationship...
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

Offline Darius

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 668
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #18 on: April 19, 2011, 10:10:23 AM »
where does Bridgewater's pumper fit into your assessement of things?

pumprescue

  • Guest
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #19 on: April 19, 2011, 05:58:39 PM »
Bridgewater pumper would be classed as a light pumper going off the specs, its the same as a 24P/34P, 500GPM pump, only thing different is the 2in 2out. Are their any other inlets or outlets ?

The NSW style Type 2's are medium pumps as has been stated.

The 3 heavy pumpers have also been listed, when the Dennis goes and if the stated replacement eventuates then the CFS will only have 2 Heavy pumps, both of which were brigade designed. The Stirling version was interfered with by HQ and we all know how that ended up, after nearly 10 years its finally good to go, and Burnside to their credit stuck to their guns and got what they wanted and surprise surprise it works !


Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #20 on: April 20, 2011, 12:05:52 AM »
where does Bridgewater's pumper fit into your assessement of things?

Its a 24P, with a PTO pump. Nothing more, nothing less. Having a PTO driven pump does not an Urban Pumper make.

You'll notice that Bridgewater "Pumper" was part of a run of five appliances built. These are:

Bridgewater Pumper
Nuriootpa 24P
Waikerie URP
Bordertown URP
Roxby Downs URP

Pick a callsign and appliance designation, I've got a hat full!

It's disappointing to see that CFS will not enforce correct appliance classification and callsign usage.

Bridgewater pumper would be classed as a light pumper going off the specs, its the same as a 24P/34P, 500GPM pump, only thing different is the 2in 2out.

Don't forget a 24P and 34P differ, as one is rated to pump 2000lpm the other 3000lpm. The 500GPM pump would sit Bridgewater "Pumper" happily in the 24P class of appliance.
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

pumprescue

  • Guest
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #21 on: April 20, 2011, 01:05:03 AM »
34P is 3000LPM....huh? Yeah, it has 3000 litres in its tank and you could probable empty it in a minute if you tried hard enough....Unless things have changed we can't get anything more out of our 34P than we could out of our 24P. I hope your toungue was in your cheek.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2011, 01:08:41 AM by pumprescue »

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #22 on: April 20, 2011, 10:19:15 AM »
34P is 3000LPM....huh? Yeah, it has 3000 litres in its tank and you could probable empty it in a minute if you tried hard enough....Unless things have changed we can't get anything more out of our 34P than we could out of our 24P. I hope your toungue was in your cheek.

Not at all, for once.

SACFS COSO + SOP's (October 2010) Glossary states:
Quote
24P Tanker: An tanker [sic] with 2000 litre water carrying capacity and 4-wheel drive. Pump capability 2000 litres per minute and can carry a specialist resource eg RCR or Hazmat

34P Tanker: An tanker [sic] with 3000 litre water carrying capacity and 4-wheel drive. Pump capability 3000 litres per minute and can carry a specialist resource eg RCR or Hazmat

You'll note that it gives no output pressure for the lpm rating, so it could well be 3000lpm @ 1kpa.

If anyone has a better and more clearly defined classification for SACFS trucks, please feel free to correct me. (and the SOP's)
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

Offline Alex

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 675
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #23 on: April 20, 2011, 11:56:19 AM »

Its a 24P, with a PTO pump. Nothing more, nothing less. Having a PTO driven pump does not an Urban Pumper make.

You'll notice that Bridgewater "Pumper" was part of a run of five appliances built. These are:

Bridgewater Pumper
Nuriootpa 24P
Waikerie URP
Bordertown URP
Roxby Downs URP

Pick a callsign and appliance designation, I've got a hat full!

It's disappointing to see that CFS will not enforce correct appliance classification and callsign usage.


Also Coromandel Valley 24P. Similar build, PTO driven 500gpm pump and 3in 3out.

pumprescue

  • Guest
Re: Heavy Pumper
« Reply #24 on: April 20, 2011, 12:14:00 PM »
Oh dear god it does say that......just when I couldn't lose any more faith in this service something else comes along to drop it even lower....the paid boffins don't understand they trucks they issue us....fishing rod where are you!!