Poll

What size of BWC's should be the standard?

5000
0 (0%)
7000
1 (5%)
9000
11 (55%)
13000
5 (25%)
17000
3 (15%)

Total Members Voted: 19

Author Topic: Size of BWC's  (Read 16554 times)

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: Size of BWC's
« Reply #25 on: January 31, 2009, 10:10:39 AM »
how can you fill 9000L of appliances...with a 7000L Tank,  Fire Gun???

sure 7000L would be good for "Top ups"...but hey...we should be assuming they will run DRY.

He is making the assumption that crews adhere to the 20% in reserve SOP's, and hence each fill is only 2400L, making total fill 7200L.

In my experiance we run our trucks near dry if the conditions allow it.
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

misterteddy

  • Guest
Re: Size of BWC's
« Reply #26 on: January 31, 2009, 05:28:26 PM »
how can you fill 9000L of appliances...with a 7000L Tank,  Fire Gun???

sure 7000L would be good for "Top ups"...but hey...we should be assuming they will run DRY.

He is making the assumption that crews adhere to the 20% in reserve SOP's, and hence each fill is only 2400L, making total fill 7200L.

In my experiance we run our trucks near dry if the conditions allow it.

does the tanker on a fireground have to keep his 20% safe margin if he has a hoseline?

Offline Zippy

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,540
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Size of BWC's
« Reply #27 on: January 31, 2009, 06:28:01 PM »
lol....

Offline Alan J

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 516
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Certified Flamin' Nuisance
    • View Profile
Re: Size of BWC's
« Reply #28 on: February 17, 2009, 09:38:22 PM »
Methinks any tanker better than no tanker.
4 x 6000 or 7000L tankers immediately available is better
than 1 x 14,000L in 2011.  Reasonable band-aid, pending
long-term fix.

Might be faster delivery of water to appliances too but I'm
too tired to think through the maths of that one just now.
At Arcadia in '01 (?) we used a shuttle of 4 or 5 x 34s plus
Burnside & another tanker to keep Dural 1 topped up & pumping.

If anything, we just need more of them, earlier at fires.
I'd go so far as to suggest if a 34 can't get a full fire-fighting
crew, they should respond anyway & operate as a light tanker.

cheers
Alan J.
Cherry Gdns CFS

Data isn't information.  Information isn't knowledge. 
Knowledge isn't wisdom.

Offline Zippy

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,540
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Size of BWC's
« Reply #29 on: February 17, 2009, 10:01:13 PM »
Yeah i agree with the use of 34's as Light BWC's.  Crew of 2 should be fine. Have the other two placed on the fire appliances to assist the operations.

 

anything