Author Topic: Interesting Fire and Emergency Related Paging (Read 4725842 times)

filtered · « **Reply #175 on:** September 26, 2007, 01:11:49 AM »

Quote from: Dezza on September 25, 2007, 11:00:27 PM

21:59:51 25-09-07 MBKR RESPOND TO FIRE ALARM ADELAIDE HILLS, HOMEMAKER LOT 221 DUTTON RD, MT BARKER *CFSRES:, FIP ALARM *WFAM*, 25/09/2007 21:58:54 CFS Mount Barker Response

22:16:47 25-09-07 MFS: INC # 89 - 25/09/07 22:16,RESPOND COMMERCIAL FIRE,DADDOW RD,MT BARKER, MAP 172 Q 5 ,,FLAMES SEEN FROM HARVEY NORMAN,1279 1268*CFSRES: CFS Mount Barker Response

Thats why a good response to fixed alarm is a must.

Who says there wasn't a good response to the fixed alarm?

I was listening to the scanner at the time and from the sounds of it they had two appliances on scene at the rear of the premises. They may not have been in view of the caller who reported the flame, but it sounded like they were still on scene dealing with the situation.

Really shits me when people give other brigades a bad name by not getting their facts straight and casting aspersions on their response!

And no, I'm not from the brigade, I just know how pissed I'd be if the same thing was said about my brigade.

Zippy · « **Reply #176 on:** September 26, 2007, 07:56:08 AM »

i wasnt refering to mt barker at all filtered. just the service as a whole.

its just a good example of when a fixed alarm is more than ya think.

mengcfs · « **Reply #177 on:** September 26, 2007, 09:35:43 AM »

MFS: INC # 4 - 26/09/07 01:15,RESPOND Tree Down,PEAKE CFS,PEAKE, MAP 0 0 0 ,,TREE OVER ROAD 1 KM EAST PEAKE - FROM SAPOL - NO OTHER INFO FROM THEM,72729*CFSRES: SES Murray Bridge

MFS: STOP FOR CALL/ CLOSER SERVICE IS BEING DESPATCHED, THANK YOU SES Murray Bridge

MFS: INC # 4 - 26/09/07 01:21,RESPOND Tree Down,PEAKE CFS,PEAKE, MAP 0 0 0 ,,TREE OVER RD 1KM EAST PEAKE - FROM SAPOL - NO FURTHER INFO AVAIL - P1,37524*CFSRES: CFS Peake Response

MFS: STOP FROM POLICE TREE REMOVED CFS Peake Response

car31 · « **Reply #178 on:** October 02, 2007, 03:25:23 PM »

MFS: INC # 41 - 02/10/07 13:03,RESPOND Vehicle Accident,VINE VALE RD,TANUNDA, MAP 0 0 0 ,,CORNER OF LIGHT PASS CLEAN UP ONLY FROM AMB,24324 631*CFSRES: CFS: ANGASTON GROUP

MFS: INC # 41 - 02/10/07 13:05,RESPOND Vehicle Accident,VINE VALE RD,TANUNDA, MAP 0 0 0 ,,UPDATE FROM AMB 2 X PERSONS TRAPPED,24119*CFSRES: CFS: Nuriootpa

oops,

Zippy · « **Reply #179 on:** October 02, 2007, 03:43:35 PM »

wasnt much of a delay, 3 car accident, one person was still retrived by Rescue 51 from a school oval in Tanunda...only a few other patients with lesser injuries.

mack · « **Reply #180 on:** October 02, 2007, 05:16:29 PM »

Quote from: Zippy on October 02, 2007, 03:43:35 PM

wasnt much of a delay, 3 car accident, one person was still retrived by Rescue 51 from a school oval in Tanunda...only a few other patients with lesser injuries.

no delay at all..

first rescue and fire were still sent initially..

goes to show though, that ya cant trust initial information no matter the source... apparently 1 person extricated ?

probie_boy · « **Reply #181 on:** October 02, 2007, 08:12:16 PM »

1909029 13:25:40 02-10-07 MFS: INC # 44 - 02/10/07 13:23,RESPOND To,6 STIRLING CT,STRATHALBYN, MAP 251 P 2 ,,PATIENT FROM HOSPITAL IN 80S SMOULDERING NEAR BACK DOOR,1558*CFSRES:

anybody know whats going on here?

Smallflame · « **Reply #182 on:** October 03, 2007, 12:21:54 AM »

Quote from: bittenyakka on September 25, 2007, 11:17:19 PM

is daddow and dutton rds the same building?

Yeah, the new homemaker centre I believe... Its where the beds and the electronics are kept i hear...

squiddy · « **Reply #183 on:** October 03, 2007, 06:09:20 AM »

Quote from: probationary one on October 02, 2007, 08:12:16 PM

1909029 13:25:40 02-10-07 MFS: INC # 44 - 02/10/07 13:23,RESPOND To,6 STIRLING CT,STRATHALBYN, MAP 251 P 2 ,,PATIENT FROM HOSPITAL IN 80S SMOULDERING NEAR BACK DOOR,1558*CFSRES:

anybody know whats going on here?

I think it was just very badly worded. Perhaps a person in their 80's just out of hospital called because something was smouldering near their back door?

Mind you, I did a double take when I first read it...

backburn · « **Reply #184 on:** October 03, 2007, 10:46:24 PM »

16:29:28 03-10-07 MFS: INC # 56 - 03/10/07 16:27,RESPOND To,BARMERA CFS,BARMERA, MAP 0 0 0 ,,JETTY AT LAKE BONNY,39124*CFSRES

That gives you a lot of information. Wonder what it was? Wonder if they can pump out of the lake if theres a fire? now that its closed off to the River

RescueHazmat · « **Reply #185 on:** October 03, 2007, 11:37:37 PM »

I was there late last year, and they could pump for months if they had too.

backburn · « **Reply #186 on:** October 04, 2007, 09:47:04 AM »

Good rumors made it sound as if it was in big trouble and that they might get blue green algy now with no current.

mengcfs · « **Reply #187 on:** October 04, 2007, 12:38:44 PM »

Quote from: backburn on October 03, 2007, 10:46:24 PM

16:29:28 03-10-07 MFS: INC # 56 - 03/10/07 16:27,RESPOND To,BARMERA CFS,BARMERA, MAP 0 0 0 ,,JETTY AT LAKE BONNY,39124*CFSRES

That gives you a lot of information. Wonder what it was? Wonder if they can pump out of the lake if theres a fire? now that its closed off to the River

The actual jetty was on fire. I thought it was a strange page, not much info so i did some investigating

RescueHazmat · « **Reply #188 on:** October 04, 2007, 02:11:30 PM »

Quote from: backburn on October 04, 2007, 09:47:04 AM

Good rumors made it sound as if it was in big trouble and that they might get blue green algy now with no current.

Those problems may exist if the water stays stagnent, however if needed im sure it could be used for fire fighting purposes. The water levels were good then though.

Jono · « **Reply #189 on:** October 06, 2007, 12:06:53 PM »

09:52:14 06-10-07 MFS: INC # 29 - 06/10/07 09:50,RESPOND RCR,STURT HWY,WAIKERIE, MAP 0 0 0 ,,3 PERSONS ,UNCONCIOUS AND TRAPPED,13 KM TOWARDS BARMERA,35519*CFSRES: CFS Waikerie Response

11:20:27 06-10-07 MFS: SIG INC: FYI: MVA STURT HWY WAIKERIE - 3 FATALITIES - CFS & SAPOL IN ATTENDANCE - FROM DSC MILLER 06/10/2007 11:18:17 AM CFS HQ Info

chook · « **Reply #190 on:** October 06, 2007, 08:22:19 PM »

Not sure if it is interesting but certainly tragic. The news report was fairly detailed on the alleged cause. One interesting fact was Barmera SES was responded as well -

1928012 10:58:32 06-10-07 VEHICLE ACCIDENT MEET CHRIS AT HEADQUARTERS AT 12.15PM FROM STUART
1918239 10:58:30 06-10-07 VEHICLE ACCIDENT MEET CHRIS AT HEADQUARTERS AT 12.15PM FROM STUART
1918239 11:20:00 06-10-07 CHANGE OF TIME FOR RCR CHRIS WOULD LIKE EVERYBODY IN HEAD QUATERS NOW FROM STAURT
this was after a phone call from SAPOL Riverland direct to the Unit Manager (Stuart)
The reason this was interesting is that this is a fairly common in this area, Barmera is one of the best SES RCR units in the State (those who know Stuart knows how pationate he is about RCR).
Barmera were called to provide traffic control, Berri were put on notice in case relief were required. Another interesting fact is this -

1919385 09:52:19 06-10-07 WAIK: *CFSRES: MORE CREW REQUIRED RESPOND WAIKERIE STATION 06-10-07 09:53
1919390 09:52:17 06-10-07 WAIK: *CFSRES: MORE CREW REQUIRED RESPOND WAIKERIE STATION 06-10-07 09:53

Very quick call for more crew? Should this have generated a call for a second rescue crew? (3 trapped) Not that I think it would have made a difference, but if we are to fix on going response issues then everyone needs to play by the rules. If faced with the same message I would definitely have responded a second team. Cheers

6739264 · « **Reply #191 on:** October 06, 2007, 08:26:34 PM »

Multiple persons trapped in multiple cars, there should have been two rescue trucks going.

Zippy · « **Reply #192 on:** October 06, 2007, 09:27:32 PM »

Quote

1919385 09:52:19 06-10-07 WAIK: *CFSRES: MORE CREW REQUIRED RESPOND WAIKERIE STATION 06-10-07 09:53
1919390 09:52:17 06-10-07 WAIK: *CFSRES: MORE CREW REQUIRED RESPOND WAIKERIE STATION 06-10-07 09:53

Very quick call for more crew? Should this have generated a call for a second rescue crew? (3 trapped) Not that I think it would have made a difference, but if we are to fix on going response issues then everyone needs to play by the rules. If faced with the same message I would definitely have responded a second team. Cheers

thats a standard press button message to say need more crew to get the truck going, often pressed around the 4min mark after reciept of callout in the aim of getting the Crew on the Road within 6 minutes. pretty much a silent Fire siren. For this sort of callout, forget a simple pager message, getting the fire siren going can ensure those in Blackspots get the message theres a going job right now.

chook · « **Reply #193 on:** October 06, 2007, 09:33:20 PM »

Thanks for clearing that up Zippy cheers

RescueHazmat · « **Reply #194 on:** October 06, 2007, 11:11:21 PM »

Should have been a 2nd alarm Rescue response on the initial call.

Zippy · « **Reply #195 on:** October 07, 2007, 11:00:48 AM »

04:56:32 07-10-07 MFS: INC # 15 - 07/10/07 04:57,RESPOND Private Alarm,PYRITES RD,BRUKUNGA, MAP 150 L 15 ,,BRAKUNGA STATE TRAINING CENTRE - 2 ALARMS - CBR A - WEST AND CBR B - EAST,1288 1298*CFSRES:

eek

and something that is strange presently is that:

04:36:27 07-10-07 MFS: INC # 14 - 07/10/07 04:37,RESPOND Private Alarm,NAIRNE RD,WOODSIDE, MAP 137 C 7 ,,WOODSIDE ARMY BARRACKS,1378 1358*CFSRES: CFS Woodside Response

we were responded 20mins after the alarm initally dropped

and it seems the Alarms connected directly to stations arent sending out WDSD: FIXED ALARM RESPOND STATION....so something has changed

bittenyakka · « **Reply #196 on:** October 07, 2007, 01:25:32 PM »

they are private alarms so it is a security company eg chubb who rings MFS

rescue5271 · « **Reply #197 on:** October 07, 2007, 02:20:49 PM »

Naracoorte had the same problem some 2 weeks ago FIP at station went into alarm pagers did not go off...It was luck that a course was on at the time.Techs came and could not find a fault in the system.....Wish they would get a move on with the change over......

Zippy · « **Reply #198 on:** October 07, 2007, 02:56:05 PM »

have to wonder if this is a Telstra problem

lol...sorry i love blaming telstra

P P Snake · « **Reply #199 on:** October 07, 2007, 07:18:34 PM »

bittenyakka, they are showing private alarms to Woodside Army camp because of what zippy posted, its not monitored by a security company, its the army camp ringing the ALERTS number to find out why no one has attended the alarm, and ADELAIDE FIRE paging out for a response

Author Topic: Interesting Fire and Emergency Related Paging (Read 4725842 times)

probie_boy

rescue5271