SAFECOM

Started by CFS_Firey, May 26, 2005, 02:53:30 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

CFS_Firey

The SAFECOM Bill was introduced into parliament this week.
All I know about it is that it will be an joining of the CFS, MFS and SES.

Does anyone else know more details, like how they want it done?

And what do people think about this?  Will it be good for the CFS or bad?

JamesGar

If you're interested to read have a look at the following:

http://www.parliament.sa.gov.au/Internet/DesktopModules/Display.aspx?CALLER=habills_search.htm&IS_QUERY=Fire&IS_PAGE_SIZE=20&SEARCH_PAGE=habills_search.asp&DOC_INDEX=1&HIGHLIGHT_HITS=True&RESULT_COUNT=40&DOC_URL=http://www.parliament.sa.gov.au/catalog/habills/503/50-03-094.htm&DOC_TITLE=Fire%20and%20Emergency%20Services%20Bill%20%5BAs%20Introduced%5D

Hopefully it work, but it is a transcript of the whole bill. Just having a quick flick through the contents I think they are looking at instigating a SAFECOM Executive Board, which I guess will displace current CFS Board. It will probably make a good reading for me on night shift tonight!
James Gardiner
Belair CFS

oz fire

There have been extensive "focus groups" (current buzz word for teams) looking at how it Will effect each service - these have included senior volunteers, VFBA representatives, and staff from each of the services and external parties.

It has been reviewed numerous times and has been subject to wide consultation so hopefully it will provide a direction for us all to move forward.

If nothing else it should at least provide a place to look at equity across the services in all areas and hopefully the board will be impartial  :|
Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the ability to control it.

CFS_Firey


Good times

If nothing else it should at least provide a place to look at equity across the services in all areas and hopefully the board will be impartial   

The board will just be for show from what I am lead to beleive, originally they were going to cut the board out all together, I think they will just be an advisory board with no power.

strikeathird

So will our turnout gear say SAFECOM on the back instead of CFS??

Or maybe both mfs and cfs have FIRE ??

Mike

It should be seen as a small step forward (we hope) in the evolution of the services. Maybe even a little tiny bit closer to amalgamation of all services....

Mike

Group reported last night that the clause relating to "landholders lighting their own fire if they believe their property is under threat" has been dropped. Now we just need to worry bout the make-up of the board its-self.......

awunecetecio

Here's how to obtain prednisone  for your needs without an RX.
 
You can locate unbeatable offers on ed sample pack 2  on internet platforms.
 
Get the optimal https://atplearningpromo.com/drug/tretinoin/  online. Secure your wellness today.